Showing posts with label handwashing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label handwashing. Show all posts

Thursday, February 10, 2022

Study Identifies Factors Associated With Negative COVID-19 Experiences

Family structure, socioeconomic status, and the experience of racism were primarily associated with negative impacts of COVID-19 across family generations in minority communities, more so than preexisting medical or psychiatric conditions, reports a study published yesterday in JAMA Psychiatry.

“[T]hese data raise the possibility that interventions aimed at the community level (e.g., provision of childcare, increased access to school meals, universal basic income to cover fundamental needs, continued COVID-19 unemployment assistance) might be effective in either preventing or combatting negative COVID-19 experiences across multiple generations within a single family,” wrote Sarah Yip, Ph.D., of the Yale School of Medicine and colleagues.

Yip and colleagues used data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, a long-term study of brain development and child health in the United States. “The availability of baseline, pre–COVID-19 data from this cohort … provides an unprecedented opportunity to quantify transgenerational predictors of COVID-19 experiences,” the authors wrote.

Upon enrollment in the ABCD Study, children and their parents answered questions about their socioeconomic status, the child’s mental and physical health, and family psychiatric history, among others. In total, the baseline assessments—collected between 2016 and 2018—included more than 17,000 characteristics. Participants then completed COVID-19-related questionnaires between May and August 2020, covering topics such as school attendance, family stressors, access to needs, social distancing, screen time, mental health, change in routine, sleep, and physical activity.

Among the 9,267 youth and their caregivers, the authors found that social determinants of inequity, including lower socioeconomic status, living in single-parent households, and experiencing racism, were primarily associated with negative COVID-19 experiences, such as food insecurity and financial worry. During the pandemic, non-White families and Spanish-speaking families had fewer resources and increased financial worry and experienced food insecurity. In contrast, White families and families who had higher incomes before the pandemic or a parent with a postgraduate degree experienced less impact associated with the pandemic, as indicated by factors such as less food insecurity and financial worry. Children from these families reported sleeping longer, less difficulties with remote learning, and decreased worry about the impact of COVID-19 on their family’s financial stability.

The analysis also revealed that parents from non-White families and Spanish-speaking families were more likely to have discussions with their children regarding COVID-19 health and prevention, such as handwashing, conserving food, protecting elderly relatives, and isolating from others than those parents in families experiencing fewer negative impacts from COVID-19.

“Our results underscore that families most affected by inequity during COVID-19 were more likely to abide by safe practices such as social distancing and handwashing, despite a popular narrative that individuals from these communities are less likely to engage in such behavior,” the authors wrote.

“[O]ur investigation is consistent with the interpretation that individual behavior alone cannot singly affect or mitigate health outcomes. Rather, psychosocial factors such as built environment, access to education, racism, and parental and community support all play pivotal roles in promoting health equity.”

For related information, see the Psychiatric Services article “COVID-19, Structural Racism, and Mental Health Inequities: Policy Implications for an Emerging Syndemic.”

(Image: iStock/BlackJack3D)




Don't miss out! To learn about newly posted articles in Psychiatric News, please sign up here.


Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Psychiatrists Offer Insights, Guidance Regarding SMI Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic

The information regarding the impacts of COVID-19 has come fast and furious—but most guidelines, advisories, and directives that have emerged in recent weeks have focused on the general public, with little mention of treating those with serious mental illness (SMI). In an article published online today in Psychiatric News, APA President-elect Jeffrey Geller, M.D., M.P.H., and Margarita Abi Zeid Daou, M.D., both of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, offer an overview of COVID-19 issues as they impact inpatients and outpatients with SMI. These issues include symptoms, service locations, comorbidities, and medications.

“Our aim is to heighten awareness of the interfaces between COVID-19 and SMI to facilitate informed treatment of people with SMI during this pandemic, with each hospital and outpatient setting knowingly modifying what it does to meet local needs,” Geller and Abi Zeid Daou wrote.

Working with patients with SMI through the COVID-19 pandemic requires that psychiatrists and mental health professionals pay attention to the many ways that common SMI symptoms—such as hallucinations, cognitive deficits, and anxiety—might impact the ability of patients to successfully engage in treatment, grasp the severity of the pandemic, and/or even recognize COVID-19 symptoms, the authors wrote. For instance, auditory hallucinations can interfere with a patient’s ability to communicate with a doctor over the phone, and paranoia can escalate when required to communicate through electronic devices. Similarly, cognitive deficits can make it challenging for a patient to follow new handwashing and social distancing practices. 

Geller and Abi Zeid Daou described the challenges that staff at psychiatric hospitals and residential settings for individuals with SMI now face, as they implement procedures to prevent the possible spread of COVID-19. Such procedures include restricting hospitalized patients to their own unit, which the authors noted in some cases “were never designed to have patients stay in them during the day”; and in residential settings, reducing the amount of time residents spend in common areas, staggering mealtimes, and excluding visitors.

“For many persons with mental illness, being alone is a terrible burden, far beyond that experienced by many others. … Loneliness precipitates psychiatric symptoms in those without SMI, let alone those with these disorders,” they noted, adding that the message of social distancing can be hard for some patients with SMI to grasp. “A clubhouse member living at home said, ‘For years they told me not to isolate myself and to be out with other people. Now they’re telling me to stay home and isolate myself. I’m confused.’”

Nonetheless, efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 among patients with SMI are critical, as these patients are likely at greater risk than the general public, due to their worse physical health and potential side effects of medications commonly used to treat their symptoms, the authors wrote.

“Like so many others in health care, we now find ourselves in rough waters with one broken oar in a craft that requires two paddles. In this health care crisis, psychiatry, like every other medical discipline, finds itself venturing forth in practice patterns with which we have no experience,” they concluded. “We might do well to heed the words of Mahatma Gandhi: ‘You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.’”

To read the full article, see the Psychiatric News article “Patients With SMI in the Age of COVID-19: What Psychiatrists Need to Know.”



APA’s COVID-19 Resource Center Keeps You Updated


APA’s COVID-19 Resource Center brings together a number of useful resources from APA and other authoritative sources to help you deal with the COVID-19.

The content of Psychiatric News does not necessarily reflect the views of APA or the editors. Unless so stated, neither Psychiatric News nor APA guarantees, warrants, or endorses information or advertising in this newspaper. Clinical opinions are not peer reviewed and thus should be independently verified.